JUST IN: They’re not asking nicely. With tens of thousands of its troops lined up along Ukraine’s eastern border, the Kremlin has publicly laid out demands that analysts say are aimed at restoring a Cold War-style European security order. The most contentious of these include a guarantee that NATO won’t admit any former Soviet republics—chiefly Ukraine—and an end to all military cooperation with those countries. While the United States and its allies swiftly rejected the demands, they also don’t seem to have quite figured out yet how to respond to Russia’s aggression. As tensions tick up on the eastern front, our experts break it all down for you.
TODAY'S EXPERT RAPID REACTION COURTESY OF:
Have we just stepped into a time machine? “Welcome back to the days of Soviet bluster, maximalist demands, and intense pressure on Washington to sell out smaller states,”Melinda says, noting that the Kremlin asked for a meeting on its demands as early as tomorrow. “Moscow’s rush proposal wants to carve the map into spheres of interest yet again.”
Chris points out that Russian President Vladimir Putin has long held these goals. But previous Russian invasions of Georgia and Ukraine, along with cyberattacks and other broadsides against the West, “have failed to bring North American and European allies to the [negotiating] table,” he says. “It is now obvious that the conventional military build-up on Ukraine’s border is trying to force the issue.”
A “strong reaction” from US President Joe Biden to Russia’s troop buildup “has given Putin pause” about a full invasion, John tells us. So the Russian president is turning to “intimidation” instead. “These demands are not realistic, but Putin sees no risk in advancing them,”John says, as he’s seeking “some smaller concessions from Washington or Brussels” such as pushing Ukraine on autonomy for the occupied territories in Donbas or holding European security talks before Putin agrees to de-escalate.
TALKING ABOUT TALKS
Biden has said he wants to hold a meeting with Russia and four NATO allies, which Melinda thinks is “a big mistake” since it leaves out Ukraine and the Baltic states. “Would it kill the White House to say no talks without our European allies and Ukraine? Ukraine gets to decide its future, not Washington or Moscow.”
Chris says Biden’s openness to talks could be “a stalling tactic,” as a proper summit would take months to execute and push back a possible Russian invasion of Ukraine in the winter. But the Kremlin’s urgent demands indicate that “Moscow seems to be on to the gambit.”
The draft treaty that Russia has proposed is thus “both a negotiating tool and a pretext for another invasion of Ukraine if Moscow judges the response from the West insufficiently rapid or sincere,” Chris says. “This a serious test for Washington and NATO, with the stakes of this crisis having been raised considerably.”
ON THE BRINK
John figures that Putin “takes some comfort” from US unwillingness to send additional arms to Ukraine now—a move that “would have a deterrent effect” on Russia—and from reports that European governments are divided on imposing sanctions on Russia if it escalates militarily in Ukraine. “Washington in particular needs to understand that brinkmanship is second nature to Moscow,” John says, “but it holds the upper hand” because it is much stronger militarily and economically than Russia.
By creating “a fake and avoidable crisis,” Melinda says, Putin is effectively telling Washington and Brussels “to get lost” from Eastern Europe. And after failing to deter the Russian leader during a video conference last week, Biden needs to raise his game, she adds:“It’s time to move NATO troops to southeast Poland and eastern Romania and for the United States to step up weapons transfers and ground and air exercises in western Ukraine.”
Ukraine - silver-ringvee-hZvVWVhk3g-unsplash-500x350.jpg